ISSN: 2456–5474 RNI No.  UPBIL/2016/68367 VOL.- VII , ISSUE- VII August  - 2022
Innovation The Research Concept
Ultrasonic Study of Molecular Interaction in Binary Liquid Mixture of Benzonitrile with Butanol-1 at 298.15K, 303.15K, 308.15K
Paper Id :  16308   Submission Date :  11/08/2022   Acceptance Date :  22/08/2022   Publication Date :  25/08/2022
This is an open-access research paper/article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
For verification of this paper, please visit on http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/innovation.php#8
Deepali Singhal
Assistant Professor
Chemistry
S. G. R. R. P.G College
Dehradun,Uttarakhand, India,
Sandeep Negi
Assistant Professor Chemistry
S G R R (PG) College
Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India(Corresponding Author)
Rakesh Dhaundiyal
Assistant Professor
Chemistry
S G R R (PG) College
Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
H V Pant, Harish Chandra
Assistant Professor
Chemistry
S G R R (PG) College
Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Abstract Ultrasonic velocity and density are experimented for organic binary liquid mixture of Benzonitrile with Butanol - 1 at T= (298.15, 303.15 and 308.15) k across the wide range of composition. The experimented data have been used to calculate isentropic compressibility (βs), intermolecular free length (Lf), molar sound velocity (Rm), specific acoustic independence (Z) and molar volume (Vm). Excess values of isentropic compressibility (βsE), intermolecular free length (LfE) and molar volume (VmE) and values of ultrasonic velocity (V) are plotted against the mole fraction of Benzonitrile across the entire range of composition. The variation of these properties is discussed in terms of intermolecular interactions.
Keywords Ultrasonic velocity, Intermolecular interaction, Binary mixtures, Density.
Introduction
Vibrational waves of a frequency above the hearing rangeof the normal ear, i.e. 16 to 20,000 cycles per second are referred to as ultrasonics. Curie brothers (1880)discovered the phenomenon of “piezoelectric effect” which is the development of electric charges on the definite faces of some crystals like quartz. Since quartz crystals possess the piezoelectric property to a greater extent, they are highly stable. I.e. strong, hard and have low temperature and used as transducer for the purpose of research work in ultrasonics.
Aim of study High amplitude vibrations in ultrasonic study causes the permanent change in the medium while the low amplitude vibrations in the ultrasonic study do not cause permanent change in the medium. The present study is based on low amplitude vibrations.
Review of Literature
Ultrasonic velocity measurements play an important role to detect weak and strong molecular interaction in liquid mixtures[1-2]. [Thermodynamic properties obtained from the ultrasonic velocity and density such as isentropic compressibility, intermolecular free length and molar volume provide useful information to understand the nature and type of interaction in the liquid mixture. 
Thermodynamic studies for liquid mixtures are useful to understand the different type of interactions, i.e.-  dipole - dipole[3-6] and dipole induced dipole[7-10] between polar-polar[11-12] and nonpolar system[13-16]
Ultrasonic velocity and density in fourteen binary liquid mixtures studies by Fort and Moore17 representing different types and degree of interaction.
Main Text

Experimental Details

The ultrasonic velocities is measured by using a single crystal ultrasonic interferometer (M/S Mittal Enterprises, New Delhi) operating at 2 MHz frequency with an accuracy of ±0.05%(Model F-81), which is calibrated with water and benzene.  The temperature stability is maintained within 0.1K by circulating thermostated water around interferometer cell that contains the liquid with a circulating pump. In order to minimize the error of measurements several maxima of ultrasonic velocity are allowed to pass and their number n is counted. All maxima are recorded with highest swing of the needle on the micrometer scale of the interferometer.  The total distance d moved by the reflector of the interferometer cell is given by

d = n λ/2 ----------------------------------(1)

Where  λ is wavelength of ultrasonic wave. The frequency ν of the interferometer crystal is accurately known (2 MHz) and using λ from eq1 , the ultrasonic velocity v m/s is calculated by the relation

v = ν λ--------------------------------------- (2)

Employing the measurement values of velocity (v) and density (ρ) some thermodynamic properties such as isentropic compressibility (βs), intermolecular free length (Lf) and molar volume (Vm) have been computed through the following expressions[18-19].

Molar volume                                                                                                                       ...… (1)                 

Vm = [M-/e]

Isentropic compressibility                                                                                  …… (2)                 

βs = 1/V2ρ

Intermolecular free length                                                                                 …… (3)

Lf = [K √βs]

High purity chemicals (E. Merck and S.D. fine) are used and purified by the standard methods[20].

Excess values of various parameters are computed using the following relation:-

AE = (A) exp – (X1A1 + X2A2) where AE is excess function (A) exp is experimental value of the mixture, A1 and A2 are the values for the pure components 1 and 2 whose mole fractions are X1 and X2.

The results obtained from these investigations have been incorporated in Table (1-3) and in Graph (1-4).

Result and Discussion

Experimental results are given in table 1,2 and 3. Ultrasonic velocity and density decreases when temperature increases (from 298.15k, 303.15k, 308.15k) whereas isentropic compressibility and molar volume increases when temperature increases.

Table 1‒Experimentally determined ultrasonic velocity, density, calculated excess values of isentropic compressibility, intermolecular free length and molar volume for Benzonitrile with Butanol-1 at 298.15K

Mole fraction

X1

Ultrasonic velocity (u)  ms-1

Density (ρ)

gml-1

Excess isentropic

Compressibility (BSE)

cm2 dyne-1

X1012

Excess intermolecular freelength (LfE)

Ao

Excess molar volume (VmE)

ml mole-1

 

1.0000

1416

1.0012

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.8894

1402

0.9862

-1.4770

-0.0050

-0.4706

0.7894

1388

0.9698

-2.7149

-0.0090

-0.8008

0.6758

1372

0.9531

-3.6002

-0.0118

-1.1038

0.5726

1360

0.9340

-4.4821

-0.0148

-1.1619

0.4718

1344

0.9147

-4.8067

-0.0157

-1.2007

0.3733

1328

0.8945

-4.8353

-0.0156

-1.1454

0.2769

1310

0.8744

-4.4156

-0.0141

-1.1001

0.1826

1292

0.8529

-3.5888

-0.0114

-0.9017

0.0903

1268

0.8305

-1.6482

-0.0049

-0.5980

0.0000

1252

0.8056

0.0000

-0.0000

0.0000

Table 2‒Experimentally determined ultrasonic velocity, density, calculated excess values of isentropic compressibility, intermolecular free length and molar volume for Benzonitrile with Butanol-1 at 303.15K

Mole fraction

X1

Ultrasonic velocity (u)  ms-1

Density (ρ)

gml-1

Excess isentropic

Compressibility(BSE)

cm2 dyne-1

X1012

Excess intermolecular freelength (LfE)

Ao

Excess molar volume (VmE)

ml mole-1

 

1.0000

1400

0.9964

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.8893

1392

0.9810

-1.9621

-0.0070

-0.4212

0.7813

1376

0.9667

-3.2219

-0.0111

-0.9598

0.6757

1360

0.9496

-4.1323

-0.0138

-1.2120

0.5726

1344

0.9321

-4.8113

-0.0159

-1.4261

0.4717

1328

0.9132

-5.1789

-0.0169

-1.4969

0.3732

1312

0.8932

-5.2285

-0.0169

-1.4528

0.2768

1292

0.8727

-4.5553

-0.0145

-1.3545

0.1825

1276

0.8521

-3.9889

-0.0127

-1.2435

0.0903

1260

0.8295

-2.9381

-0.0095

-0.9071

0.0000

1236

0.8020

0.0000

-0.0000

0.0000

Table 3‒Experimentally determined ultrasonic velocity, density, calculated excess values of isentropic compressibility, intermolecular free length and molar volume for Benzonitrile with Butanol-1 at 308.15K

Mole fraction

X1

Ultrasonic velocity (u)  ms-1

Density (ρ)

gml-1

Excess isentropic

Compressibility (BSE)

cm2 dyne-1

X1012

Excess intermolecular freelength (LfE)

Ao

Excess molar volume (VmE)

ml mole-1

 

1.0000

1382

0.9918

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.8893

1368

0.9817

-1.8271

-0.0063

-0.9628

0.7812

1358

0.9667

-3.5513

-0.0123

-1.4178

0.6756

1342

0.9500

-4.5032

-0.0152

-1.7006

0.5724

1328

0.9317

-5.3230

-0.0178

-1.8205

0.4716

1310

0.9130

-5.5156

-0.0180

-1.9011

0.3730

1294

0.8939

-5.6164

-0.0182

-1.9416

0.2767

1280

0.8731

-5.5383

-0.0180

-1.8010

0.1824

1264

0.8518

-4.9163

-0.0160

-1.6031

0.0902

1244

0.8297

-3.4014

-0.0110

-1.3114

0.0000

1220

0.7988

0.0000

-0.0000

0.0000

Excess values of isentropic compressibility (Fig-2), intermolecular free length (Fig-3) and molar volume(Fig-4) show negative deviations. While density decreases with the increase in concentration of Butanol-1.

Conclusion In the present study βsE, LfE and VmE all have been found to be negative. This indicates that specific interaction is taking place between the components of mixtures.
References
1. Joykumar S, Karunanithi N &Kannappan V, Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys., 34(1996)761. 2. Kannappan V, Xavier Jesu Raja S & Jaya Santhi R, Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys., 41(2003)690. 3. Mozo I, Fuente I G, Gonzalez J A &Cobos J C, J. Chem. Thermodyn., 42(2010)17. 4. Kumar R, Mahesh R, Shanmugapriyan B &Kannappan V, Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys., 50(2010)633. 5. Iloukhani H &Samiey B, Phys. Chem. Liq., 45(2007)571. 6. Mehra R & Gaur A K, J. Chem. Engg. Data, 53(2008)863. 7. Sastry N V, Thakor R R& Patel M C, J. Mol. Liq., 114(2009)13. 8. Treszczanowicz A J &Treszczanowicz T, Fluid Phase Equilib., 135(1997)179. 9. Mehra R &Israni R, Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys., 38(2000)341. 10. Dean R, Moulins J, MacInnis A &Palepu R M, Phys. Chem. Liq., 47(2009)302. 11. Mehra R & Gaur A K, J. Ind. Council Chem., 26(2009)85. 12. Kubendran1 R, Khan F L A, Asghar J, Aravinthraj M &Udayaseelan J, Arch. Appl. Sci. Res., 3(2011)568. 13. Mehra R &Israni R, Indian J. Chem. Technol., 9(2002)341. 14. Mehra R &Israni R, J. Indian Chem. Soc., 81(2004)227. 15. Mehra R Z, Phys. Chem., 219(2005)425. 16. Mehra R & Gaur A K, J. Modern Chemistry & Chemical Technology, 2(2011)24. 17. Fort R J and Moore W R, Trans Faraday Soc., 61(1965)2102. 18. Subramaniyam Naidu P &Ravindra Prasad K, Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys., 42(2004)512. 19. EzhilPavai R, Vasantharani P &KannappanA ,Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys., 42(2004)934. 20.Vogel A I, A textbook of practical Organic Chemistry, 5thEdn (Jhon Willey, New York) 1989.